Circuits Rump Session
Thursday, June 13, 8:00 pm – 10:00 pm
R-1: Lessons and Challenges for Future Mixed-Signal, RF, and Memory Circuits
Organizers: P. Hanumolu, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, N. Lu, Etron Technology, Inc.
Moderators: T. Lee, Stanford and N. Lu, Etron Technology, Inc.
Panelists:
A. Abidi, UCLA
M. Bauer, Micron
J.S Choi, Samsung
C. Mangelsdorf, ADI
A. Matsuzawa, Tokyo Institute of Technology
U-K Moon, Oregon State University
B. Nauta, University of Twente
K. Zhang, Intel
Designing mixed-signal circuits is prone with pitfalls. Degrading transistor performance combined with lack of poor models and fast large-scale simulators further exacerbate classical circuit problems. Is it possible to achieve 1st silicon success under this uncertainty or some of the mistakes inevitable? Experts from industry and academia will address this question and present their perspectives. They will share lessons learned in their own careers and present challenges for mixed-signal, RF and memory chips going forward. Each of the panelists will be asked to highlight the key bottlenecks in achieving 1st silicon success and outline ways to address them. The panelists will also discuss these circuits when applied to interconnect technologies such as the 3D/2.5D integration.
R-2: What should circuit designers do in an era of system level design?
Organizers: S. Dillen, Qualcomm and S. Dosho, Panasonic
Moderators: J. Rabaey, University of California, Berkeley
Panelists:
S. Goto, Waseda University
C-M Hung, MediaTek
S. Naffziger, AMD
B. Nikolic, University of California, Berkeley
S. Ryu, Samsung
J. Savoj, Xilinx
E. Terzioglu, Qualcomm
J. Warnock, IBM
As technology scaling continues to follow Moore’s law, both the manufacturing cost and time to market (TTM) are becoming exorbitant. Conversely, system-based design using licensed IP in an ASIC flow, or FPGA-based design can significantly reduce design time and thus time to market. There are two parts to this complicated problem. First, board-level system designers can switch to using a reconfigurable FPGA chip rather than going through the expensive, time-consuming process of developing a custom ASIC solution. While FPGA power, performance and area (PPA) are generally worse, the increasing cost and TTM of a custom solution combined with improving FPGA PPA metrics may result in higher adoption of this solution. Similarly, even in a custom ASIC design, foundry and foundry-partners offer many IP solutions directly to customers which can lead to a reduction in full-custom IP design, reduce risk and TTM.
On the other hand, deep sub-micron technology challenges and designing circuits with good PPA metrics require more detailed circuit design and understanding. Also, adapting quickly to new design requirements and interface standards could require custom solutions in order to capture or maintain a market leadership position.
Will custom VLSI design be confined to a niche market or will VLSI circuit designers still play an integral role in the design process as this design evolution continues? A panel of VLSI circuit design experts will present their opinions on this topic and discuss what is the future of VLSI circuit design.